Paulina Twarogal
Hiring external companies for tasks traditionally handled by in-house employees has become a common practice for businesses globally. Typically accomplished through outsourcing and outstaffing, this approach optimizes their workforce and helps achieve business goals. Projections show that spending on outsourcing and outstaffing will reach $936.6 billion by 2027, with an annual growth rate of 7.7% until then.
Choosing between the two isn’t that straightforward, though. They both provide businesses with the flexibility to access top talents and fill missing skill gaps in their teams. But that’s where the similarity ends.
In this article, you’ll learn the key differences between these two models, their benefits, and potential drawbacks.
What is outstaffing?
Outstaffing is a way of expanding a business’s capabilities with external help, whether nearshore, offshore, or onshore. This is achieved by hiring individual professionals to work directly with the client on specific tasks or projects. Unlike traditional outsourcing models, contractors in outstaffing are committed exclusively to one client, rather than working from project to project.
This approach proves to be an excellent long-term strategy for augmenting IT staff. It works particularly well for those companies already equipped with a solid in-house IT team looking to find experts in a specific area, all without the headaches of taking on long-term employees.
With outstaffing, the client takes on a more active role in managing the remote team. Although the outstaffed workers aren’t physically present on-site, they are considered part of the team and the client oversees their work. This includes coordinating tasks, milestones, information sharing, and deliverables.
In terms of costs, both outstaffing and outsourcing present financially sound options, depending on the company’s objectives. However, choosing outstaffing can be more affordable for long-term team growth without the challenges of extensive hiring and training.
Outstaffing: What are the benefits?
The outstaffing model brings significant advantages for both tech and non-tech companies. It helps them stay competitive, expand quickly, and boost revenues substantially. Let’s dive into more details.
Full control over the development process
In the outstaffing service model, businesses take the lead in overseeing and managing their remote teams. This hands-on approach extends to crucial elements, including strategic planning, task distribution, quality assessment, and the ability to adapt in real-time to changing project requirements. In essence, outstaffing empowers companies with the control they need for a seamless and successful development journey.
Flexibility and scalability
Outstaffing provides companies with the flexibility to scale their teams based on project needs, eliminating the hurdles of long-term hiring commitments. For example, if a company needs a designer for a month, it can easily have one for that duration. As soon as project requirements change, they can scale resources up or down.
The process of adding or disconnecting employees is streamlined when working with a single outstaffing company, ensuring a straightforward and rapid solution.
Easily trackable results
Businesses have direct access to the work done by their outstaffed developers which allows them to assess their performance and the outcomes of their efforts.
Lower costs than in-house
Companies can often achieve cost savings by paying for the dedicated time and expertise of outstaffed professionals. After all, hiring a remote team of IT specialists proves to be less costly compared to employing full-time experts working in-house. Businesses can save up to 40% with IT outstaffing.
This is because they’re not required to cover expenses for talent search, onboarding, or termination; instead, these responsibilities fall on the outstaffing partner’s shoulders. Moreover, outstaffed teams adopt a remote working approach that eliminates the need for companies to invest in establishing expensive IT infrastructure on their premises.
Access to top talent
As the demand for skilled workers continues to grow, assembling a team of professionals tailored to the company’s specific requirements becomes increasingly challenging. Right now, almost 9 in 10 businesses are experiencing gaps in their IT teams or expect them within a few years. In this case, outstaffing services present a major advantage because they open the door to a broad talent pool.
Faster time-to-market
One of the significant advantages of IT outstaffing is that it helps companies bring their product to market faster. This is achieved through a dedicated team of specialists working exclusively on the project, aligning their skills with its specific requirements. They don’t need to learn the ropes of the business; they already know how to do their job. In a fast-paced market, a quicker product launch is a game-changer, giving companies a competitive edge and allowing users to provide timely feedback for improvements.
Outstaffing: the drawbacks
While outstaffing presents some undeniable advantages, it also comes with some challenges.
Responsibility for choosing and managing remote developers
While it’s good to be able to select high-quality developers and have full control over them, this power comes with responsibility. So, if a company lacks technical expertise or doesn’t have a CTO, choosing the right developer can be problematic. The same goes for managing remote employees. Without having a dedicated project manager, doing so might be a challenge. In such cases, the outsourcing development model may prove to be a better option.
Communication challenges
Overcoming communication barriers is a serious challenge in outstaffing. The outstaffed team might be in a different region or time zone, making task coordination and effective communication demanding. Nevertheless, these challenges can be mitigated with the appropriate tools and communication protocols.
Data security concerns
Sharing sensitive information and intellectual property with external teams is an inherent aspect of outstaffing. This, however, gives rise to concerns about data security, prompting companies to establish proper safeguards to protect their confidential information.
Dependency on third-party providers
Relying on this IT outsourcing model requires businesses to trust the expertise and reliability of external providers. If any issues arise, the client company may face delays or disruptions in project execution.
What is outsourcing?
Companies (the client) choose to outsource when they have an idea but lack the means to implement it independently. Instead of setting up an entire in-house IT department, they can turn to another company with a concept and pay a specified amount to get an application or website ready. This scheme of work is suitable for everyone, including start-up owners and those with established businesses that are already operational and generating revenue.
So, unlike outstaffing individual specialists for specific development tasks, outsourcing involves contracting out an entire project or specific tasks to an external vendor, who takes responsibility for the project—from planning to development and delivery.
The responsibility for managing the outsourced team lies primarily with the external service provider. The client may provide input and feedback, but the day-to-day management is handled by the outsourcing partner.
In the bigger business picture, about 92% of G2000 companies use outsourcing for their IT needs. Also, around 300,000 jobs in the U.S. are outsourced every year. This shows that many organizations see the benefits of outsourcing for their work and for saving on operational costs.
Outsourcing: What advantages are there?
There are various reasons why companies choose to outsource their projects.
Seamless project development
Partnering with a software outsourcing agency opens the door for companies to see their entire project come to life. The agency takes great care in understanding the company’s needs, preferences, and budget, transforming conceptual ideas into tangible reality. This collaborative and thorough process ensures a customized solution that perfectly aligns with the client’s goals.
Reduced costs
Some business owners may wonder how they can possibly reduce costs through outsourcing if that obviously entails hiring an additional service. Well, the answer is simple. Outsourcing certain business operations saves organizations the expenses associated with hiring and training additional employees.
Many companies in Western Europe, for example, hire developers from Eastern Europe because of the lower rates in that region. This not only reduces costs significantly but also provides access to a highly skilled talent pool.
Moreover, it removes the need to maintain an in-house IT department and deal with employee benefits, payroll, and infrastructure. All of it is on the outsourcing company’s shoulders. The money saved can then be redirected into other aspects of the business to ensure sustainability and maximize profits.
No management headaches
The responsibility of managing the project won’t weigh on the company’s shoulders; the agency will take care of it. This only eases the workload on in-house employees but also grants them more time to focus on other essential company projects.
Access to a large talent pool
Outsourcing provides access to top-tier talent for businesses. In certain cases, the local market may lack sufficient qualified candidates, leading to compromises in hiring. Seeking talent in other countries allows organizations to tap into a broader and more diverse pool of professionals. Outsourcing proves to be a savvy solution, especially when in need of specialized skills or expertise.
Concentrating on core actions
When businesses outsource non-core functions, it enables them to concentrate on their primary strengths and strategic goals. According to Deloitte’s Global Outsourcing Survey, 65% of organizations state that outsourcing helps them focus on their core functions. This increased focus can lead to innovation and a boost in competitiveness.
Outsourcing: Are there any drawbacks?
Bringing on an outsourcing software development team means granting a third party direct control over business processes, which introduces certain risks.
Less control and flexibility
Outsourcing tasks to another company may come with constraints imposed by inflexible contract agreements. What does it really imply? It means that the client’s control over software, procedures, protocols, hiring processes, and scheduling may be reduced. This approach could also limit the flexibility businesses need to adapt as they grow or face changes.
So, if you like to be involved in the day-to-day activities of coding, planning, and scheduling, outsourcing may not be the right option for you.
Decreased security
Outsourcing can complicate data security by involving multiple sites sharing information, which increases the risk of data leaks. Additionally, control over hiring and employee protocols may be limited, affecting the oversight of company information.
Limited access to the codebase
Following an NDA agreement, the rights to the code transfer to the client. However, during the building phase, access is intentionally limited by the software outsourcing company as a precaution against potential data theft. Companies typically receive demos showcasing progress within specific timeframes.
Nonetheless, this restriction might pose challenges, especially for companies that highly value direct and continuous control over the development process.
Expertise is built outside the company
The knowledge and skills gained during a project are incredibly valuable. When outsourcing, however, that expertise stays with an external partner once the contract ends. While the company gets the solution, the expertise remains outside, posing a risk for future in-house projects or additional work on the outsourced project. This means organizations will always need to depend on their partner for that specific expertise.
Communication problems
As in the case of outstaffing, many businesses find communication to be a major hurdle in outsourcing. This may stem from various factors, such as cultural differences (both nationally and within organizations), language barriers, and the decentralized structure of teams.
Adding to the challenge, the dynamic between the client and service provider can worsen communication issues. Service providers are aiming to meet client demands without questioning feasibility, which may lead to unmet expectations and disappointment in the final outcomes.
Costs can be higher than expected
While outsourcing is often seen as a way to cut costs, opting for the cheapest option may result in higher costs later. It’s crucial to ensure that initial cost savings don’t compromise other factors, like potential delays and additional expenses due to slower delivery times or compromised quality. A comprehensive approach to cost evaluation is vital for the long-term success of outsourcing endeavors.
Outstaffing vs outsourcing: Key differences
Here’s a comparison of outsourcing and outstaffing, highlighting key features like cost, onboarding time, control, communication, flexibility, and responsibility.
Features | Outstaffing | Outsourcing |
Cost | There’s potential for lower costs since companies pay only for hiring the required staff and developers. | More expensive because businesses have to cover the costs of hiring the entire team. |
Onboarding time | Typically faster due to established processes and experienced teams. | May take longer to integrate new team members into the client’s specific processes and culture. |
Control | Provides high control over team management, task prioritization, and project execution as team members work directly with the client. | All the processes are handled by the service provider. This, however, gives limited control over day-to-day operations and project management. |
Communication | Direct communication with team members—it ensures clearer instructions, immediate feedback, and better alignment with project goals. | Communication through project managers or intermediaries. This may create communication barriers. |
Flexibility | Highly flexible, allowing clients to adjust team size, roles, or project focus more easily based on evolving business needs. | Less flexible once the contract is signed. Any changes might lead to additional costs or contract renegotiation. |
Responsibility | Clients take responsibility for project outcomes. This means enterprises need to oversee projects to ensure their business goals are met. | Service providers take responsibility for delivering project outcomes, including quality and deadlines. |
When and which model to choose?
Before making a decision whether to go for outsourcing or outstaffing, consider a few key aspects, such as your company’s goals and needs, type of problem, project scope, time, and budget.
Outsourcing becomes a better choice for companies that:
- Don’t have a core product or service based on tech solutions.
- Lack the budget for a full-stack tech department.
- Have an overwhelmed tech team, making it difficult to take on another project.
- Lack expertise in developing the product.
- Are large corporations with the resources to manage external vendors.
On the other hand, outstaffing is the ideal option for businesses that:
- Need to supplement their tech department with specialists who have a specific skill set.
- Have insufficient resources for a particular development phase (e.g., QA/QC testing or UX).
- Prefer to avoid hiring/HR tasks and need a specialist promptly.
- Want to maintain control and oversight of every development process..
How can Neontri help you?
As your business expands, the demand for IT skilled talents naturally increases. However, the process of hiring and managing a full-time workforce can be both challenging and time-consuming.
Neontri offers a solution. Our experts are here to assist you in finding top-notch IT talents, taking care of payroll and benefits, ensuring everything’s compliant, and managing employee relations. We don’t just expand your workforce; we introduce highly skilled professionals who seamlessly integrate into your team, becoming true team players.
With access to a database of 40,000 vetted IT specialists, we guarantee the right fit for your needs. Having been entrusted with over 300 finance, banking, and e-commerce projects, we bring unparalleled experience and reliability. After all, it’s not just about filling roles, it’s about finding the right people.
Our experts reject generic fixes, opting instead for tailored solutions that match unique business needs. So, while we handle the details, you can focus on what really matters—core operations. Let’s discuss the ways of boosting your business while we handle the details.
FAQ
How does cost compare between outsourcing and outstaffing?
Outstaffing is generally cheaper since companies pay for specific staff hourly or monthly. When it comes to outsourcing, the costs may be both higher or lower. It all depends on the project. Outsourcing often includes project management fees on top of labor costs.
Which option provides more control over a project?
Outstaffing offers more control as the outstaffed workers become part of the company’s team. Outsourcing, on the other hand, provides less control. It’s the outsourcing company that manages the project and team.
Are there any industry-specific considerations?
Both work well, but outstaffing might be ideal for short-term projects where a specific skillset is needed, for example, a graphic designer for a marketing campaign. Also, some industries with stricter regulations might prefer outstaffing for better control. Outsourcing might be a good fit for complex projects where companies lack in-house expertise. For instance, for software development.
What are potential risks associated with outsourcing and outstaffing?
Both outsourcing and outstaffing may pose communication risks due to distance or language barriers. Outsourcing has additional risk of relying on a third-party company to deliver, and in outstaffing, finding and managing qualified staff can be time-consuming.
How does outsourcing and outstaffing affect the company culture?
Outstaffing might be more seamless because the outstaffed workers become part of the company’s team. In the case of outsourcing, it can create a bit of separation between the internal team and the external team working on the project.
Which option is more effective for a long-term project?
Outsourcing can work well for large, complex projects if the vendor has experience managing similar projects for a long time.
Continue Exploring
The Pros and Cons of In-House vs Outsourcing Software Development